RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar a resposta do ciclo produtivo de genótipos de abobrinha italiana cultivadas em condições de campo em duas épocas de cultivo por meio do modelo não linear logístico e seus pontos críticos. Para isso dois experimentos foram conduzidos em delineamento blocos ao acaso, com três genótipos (Caserta, PX13067051 e Tronco) e duas épocas de cultivo (primavera-verão e verão-outono) com oito repetições e a unidade experimental composta por 7 plantas. Ajustou-se o modelo não linear logístico para a variável massa de frutos, em função da soma térmica acumulada, e estimou-se os pontos críticos pelas derivadas parciais da função ajustada. Os pressupostos do modelo não linear não foram atendidos para nenhum genótipo em ambas as épocas avaliadas, e para contornar este problema foi realizado o ajuste por reamostragens bootstrap. Os resultados de não linearidade intrínseca e paramétrica confirmam a qualidade do ajuste do modelo. Pelos parâmetros e pontos críticos do modelo foi possível determinar que os genótipos de abobrinha italiana avaliados foram mais produtivos na primavera-verão. Os genótipos PX13067051 e Caserta apresentaram produtividade superior ao genótipo Tronco, além de serem mais precoces e apresentar maiores taxas de produção. O modelo de crescimento logístico e seus pontos críticos foram capazes de caracterizar o ciclo de produção dos genótipos de abobrinha italiana em diferentes épocas de cultivo, e permitiu que inferências fossem realizadas com vistas a diferenciar os genótipos e as épocas de cultivo avaliadas.

ABSTRACT This study aimed to identify the productive cycle response of Italian zucchini genotypes grown under field conditions in two growing seasons using the nonlinear logistic model and its critical points. Two randomized block experiments were conducted, with three genotypes (Caserta, PX13067051, and Tronco) and two growing seasons (spring-summer and summer-fall), with eight replicates and each experimental unit consisting of 7 plants. The logistic nonlinear model was adjusted for the fruit mass variable, as a function of the accumulated thermal sum, and the critical points were estimated by the partial derivatives of the adjusted function. Adjustment by bootstrap resampling was performed to address the violation of assumptions. The results of intrinsic and parametric nonlinearity confirm the quality of the model fit. This experiment demonstrated that the zucchini genotypes evaluated were more productive in the spring-summer growing season, using the parameters and critical points obtained from the logistic nonlinear model. Genotypes PX13067051 and Caserta showed superior productivity to the Tronco genotype, and also fruited earlier and at a higher rate of production. The logistic growth model and its critical points characterized the production cycle of the zucchini genotypes in different growing seasons and allowed inferences to be made to differentiate the genotypes and the growing seasons.

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to determine the sample size necessary to estimate the mean and coefficient of variation in four species of crotalarias (C. juncea, C. spectabilis, C. breviflora and C. ochroleuca). An experiment was carried out for each species during the season 2014/15. At harvest, 1,000 pods of each species were randomly collected. In each pod were measured: mass of pod with and without seeds, length, width and height of pods, number and mass of seeds per pod, and mass of hundred seeds. Measures of central tendency, variability and distribution were calculated, and the normality was verified. The sample size necessary to estimate the mean and coefficient of variation with amplitudes of the confidence interval of 95% (ACI95%) of 2%, 4%, ..., 20% was determined by resampling with replacement. The sample size varies among species and characters, being necessary a larger sample size to estimate the mean in relation of the necessary for the coefficient of variation.

ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to estimate the leaf area of Crotalaria juncea according to the linear dimensions of leaves from different ages. Two experiments were conducted with C. juncea cultivar IAC-KR1, in the 2014/2015 sowing seasons. At 59, 82, 102, 129 days after sowing (DAS) of the first and 61, 80, 92, 104 DAS of the second experiment, 500 leaves were collected, totaling 4,000 leaves. In each leaf, the linear dimensions were measured (length, width, length/width ratio and length × width product) and the specific leaf area was determined through Digimizer and Sigma Scan Pro software, after scanning images. Then, 3,200 leaves were randomly separated to generate mathematical models of leaf area (Y) in function of linear dimension (x), and 800 leaves for the models validation. In C. juncea, the leaf areas determined by Digimizer and Sigma Scan Pro software are identical. The estimation models of leaf area as a function of length × width product showed superior adjustments to those obtained based on the evaluation of only one linear dimension. The linear model Ŷ=0.7390x (R2=0.9849) of the real leaf area (Y) as a function of length × width product (x) is adequate to estimate the C. juncea leaf area.